Везде
THE MORA PROBLEM IN THE FIELD OF THE PROTO-INDO-EUROPEAN ABLAUT: THE CASE OF 'HEAVY ROOTS'
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
THE MORA PROBLEM IN THE FIELD OF THE PROTO-INDO-EUROPEAN ABLAUT: THE CASE OF 'HEAVY ROOTS'
Annotation
PII
S241377150000616-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Alexei Belov 
Edition
Volume 70 Issue 5
Pages
49-54
Abstract
This paper deals with the well-known in the European linguistics problem of so called 'heavy (base) roots', discussed from the alternative point of view: it is question of the quantity of such morae in such roots and the adequacy of their existing reconstructions. It is shown that the almost forgotten approach to reconstruction of F. Fortunatov is advantageous in its refl ection of PIE, pointing at the same time to certain peculiarities, quite similar to the well-known in typology morphosyllabic languages.
Keywords
Prosody, Proto-Indo-European, mora, Ablaut, heavy roots, morphosyllabic languages
Date of publication
01.09.2011
Number of purchasers
1
Views
1062
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
Additional services access
Additional services for the article
Services benefits
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Saussure F. de. Mémoire sur le système primitif des voyelles dans les langues indo-européenes. Leipsick, 1879.
2. Semeren'i O. Vvedenie v sravnitel'noe yazykoznanie. M.: Progress, 1980.
3. Meyer-Brügger M. Indogermanische Sprachwissenschaft. Berlin; N.Y.: Walter de Gruyter, 2002. 
4. Belov A.M. Vopros o morah (oppoziciya arifmeticheskoj kratnosti v grecheskom i latinskom yazykah) // Discipuli magistro (k 80-letiyu N. A. Fyodorova). M.: RGGU, 2008. 
5. Belov A.M. Latinskoe udarenie (problemy rekonstrukcii). M.: Academia, 2009. 
6. Gerasimov I.A. Problemy refleksacii laringalov v vedijskom yazyke. M.: URSS, 2009.
7. Hock H.H. Compensatory Lengthening: In Defense of the Concept \'Mora\' // Folia Linguistica 20 (1986). S. 431-460.
8. Gercenberg L.G. Voprosy rekonstrukcii indoevropejskoj prosodiki. L.: Nauka, 1981.
9. Meje A. Vvedenie v sravnitel'noe izuchenie indoevropejskih yazykov. M.; L., 1938.
10. Gercenberg L.G. Rekonstrukciya indoevropejskih slogovyh akcentov // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 1978. № 6. S. 36-44. 
11. Kasevich V.B. Fonologicheskie problemy obshchego i vostochnogo yazykoznaniya. M.: Nauka, 1983. 
12. Krylov Yu.Yu. Problemy slogovoj i mon-khmerskoj fonologii. Avtoreferat diss… d.f.n. SPb., 2010. 
13. Trubeckoj N.S. Osnovy fonologii. M., 2000. 
14. Sihler A. New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin. N.Y.; Oxford, 1995. 
15. Clackson J. Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, 2007. 
16. Hayes B. Compensatory Lengthening in Moraic Phonology // Linguistic Inquiry 20 (1989). No. 2. R. 253-306. 
17. Gordon M.K. Syllable Weight: Phonetics, Phonology, Typology. N.Y.; London: Routledge, 2006. 
18. Kacnel'son S.D. Teoriya sonantov F. F. Fortunatova i ee znachenie v svete sovremennyh dannyh // Voprosy yazykoznaniya. 1954. № 6. S. 47-61. 
19. Kacnel'son S.D. Ob obyazatel'noj i fakul'tativnoj apokope // Philologica. Issledovaniya po yazyku i literature. Pamyati akademika V.M. Zhirmunskogo. L.: Nauka, 1973. 
20. Fox A. Prosodic Features and Prosodic Structures: The Phonology of Suprasegmentals. Oxford University Press, 2000. 
21. Klejner Yu.A. Problemy prosodiki. SPb.: Izd-vo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, 2002. 
22. Kuz'menko Yu.K. Zapadno-yutskij tolchok // Lingvisticheskie issledovaniya, 1986. M., 1986. 
23. Panfilov E.D. Fonologicheskie slogi klassicheskoj latyni (issledovanie spiska). Chast' I. Odnoslozhnye slovoformy. L., 1973. Chast' II. Mnogoslozhnye slovoformy. L., 1980. 
24. Belov A.M. Sliyaniya glasnyh i ih svyaz' s \"prosodicheskoj morfologiej\" drevnegrecheskogo glagola // Indoevropejskoe yazykoznanie i klassicheskaya filologiya. SPb., 2009.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate