Additional sources and materials
1. Apresyan Yu.D. Tipy informacii dlya poverhnostno-semanticheskogo komponenta modeli “Smysl ⇔ Tekst” // Wiener Slawistischer Almanach. Sonderband 1. Wien, 1980. [Apresjan, Ju.D. [Types of information for the surface semantic somponent of the “Meaning ⇔ Text” model]. Wiener Slawistischer Almanach. Sonderband 1. Wien, 1980.]
2. Boguslavskij I.M. Sfera dejstviya nachinatel'nosti i aktual'noe chlenenie: vtyagivanie remy // Semiotika i informatika. M., 1998. Vyp. 36. [Boguslavskij, I.M. [Scope of Inceptiveness and Infor- mation Structure: the Retraction of Rheme]. Semiotika i informatika [Semiotics and Informatics]. Moscow, 1998. Issue 36.]
3. Gak V.G. Semanticheskoe pole konca. // Logiche- skij analiz yazyka. Semantika nachala i kon- ca. Otv. red. N.D. Arutyunova. M., 2002. s. 50–55. [Gak, V.G. [Semantic field of ‘end’]. Logicheskiy analiz yazyka. Semantika nachala i kontsa [Logical Analysis of Language. Semantics of Beginning and End]. N.D. Arutyunova, Ed. Moscow, 2002. Pp. 50–55.]
4. Kustova G.I. Semanticheskie aspekty leksicheskih funkcij (glagoly so znacheniem ‘nachat'sya’ / ‘konchit'sya’) // Logicheskij analiz yazyka. Semantika nachala i konca. Otv. red. N.D. Arutyunova. M., 2002. s. 69–82. [Kustova, G.I. [Semantic Aspects of Lexical Functions (Verbs Meaning ‘to Begin’/‘to End’)]. Logicheskiy analiz yazyka. Semantika nachala i kontsa [Logical Analysis of Language. Semantics of Beginning and End]. N.D. Arutyunova, ed. Moscow, 2002. Pp. 69–82.]
5. Paducheva E.V. Dinamicheskie modeli v semantike leksiki. M., 2004. [Paducheva, E.V. Dinamicheskie modeli v semantike leksiki [Dynamic Models in the Semantics of the Lexicon]. Moscow, 2004.]
6. Apresyan V.Yu. Glagoly ischeznut' i propast': mnogoznachnost' i semanticheskaya motivaciya // Komp'yuternaya lingvistika i intellektual'nye tekhnologii: Mezhdunarodnaya konferenciya “Dialog”. M., 2016. [Apresjan, V.Ju. [Ischeznut’ ‘to Disappear’ and Propast’ ‘to Vanish’: Polysemy and Semantic Motivation]. Komp’yuternaya lingvistika i intellektual’nye tehnologii: Dialog’2016 [Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies: Dialogue’2016]. Moscow, 2016.]
7. Apresyan Yu.D. Sistemoobrazuyushchie smysly ‘znat'’ i ‘schitat'’ v russkom yazyke // Russkij yazyk v nauch- nom osveshchenii. 2001. № 1. s. 5–26. [Apresjan, Ju.D. [System-Forming Meanings ‘to Know’ and ‘to Think’ in Russian]. Russkij jazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii [Russian Language in Linguistic Perspective]. 2001. No. 1. Pp. 5–26.]
8. Apresyan Yu.D. Fundamental'naya klassifikaciya predikatov // Yazykovaya kartina mira i sis- temnaya leksikografiya / Pod red. Yu.D. Apresyana. M., 2006. s. 75–109. [Apresjan, Ju.D. [Fundamental Classification of Predicates]. Jazykovaja kartina mira i sistemnaja leskikografija [Linguistic Worldview and Systematic Lexicography]. Ju.D. Apresjan, ed. Moscow, 2006. Pp. 75–109.]
9. Arnold van Gennep. The Rites of Passage. 1909. University of Chicago Press, 1960.
10. Glovinskaya M.Ya. Semanticheskie tipy vidovyh protivopostavlenij russkogo glagola. M., 1982. [Glovinskaja, M.Ja. Semanticheskie tipy vidovyx protivopostavlenij russkogo glagola [Semantic Types of the Aspectual Oppositions of Russian Verbs]. Moscow, 1982.]
Comments
No posts found