ДРАМАТУРГИЧЕСКИЕ ПРОИЗВЕДЕНИЯ КАК ОСОБЫЙ ОБЪЕКТ ДИСКУРСИВНОГО АНАЛИЗА (К ПОСТАНОВКЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ)
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
ДРАМАТУРГИЧЕСКИЕ ПРОИЗВЕДЕНИЯ КАК ОСОБЫЙ ОБЪЕКТ ДИСКУРСИВНОГО АНАЛИЗА (К ПОСТАНОВКЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ)
Annotation
PII
S241377150000616-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
3-10
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to draw attention to texts of plays because up till now this material has never been the focus of linguistic analysis and, moreover, has never been studied from the point of view of discourse analysis; to describe peculiar features of their organization alongside with titles of plays, lists of their characters, stage directions of various types and so on. In the long run, all these help to understand the possibilities of the cognitive-and-discourse approach to the new material, to present discourse as the highest reality of the language and to define new directions in its analysis.
Date of publication
01.07.2020
Number of purchasers
2
Views
1064
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2008
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Kubryakova E.S., Aleksandrova O.V. Vidy prostranstv teksta i diskursa//Kategorizaciya mira: prostranstvo i vremya. Materialy nauchnoj konferencii M.: MGU, 1997.
2. Kubryakova E.S., Aleksandrova O.V. O konturah novoj paradigmy znaniya v lingvistike//Struktura i semantika hudozhestvennogo teksta. Doklady VII Mezhdunarodnoj konferencii. M., 1999.
3. Kubryakova E.S. O ponyatiyah diskursa i diskursivnogo analiza v sovremennoj lingvistike (Obzor)//Diskurs, rech', rechevaya deyatel'nost': Funkcional'nye i strukturnye aspekty. M., 2000.
4. Kubryakova E.S. O termine “diskurs” i stoyashchej za nim strukture znaniya//Yazyk. Lichnost'. Tekst. Sb. statej k 70-letiyu T.M. Nikolaevoj. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoj kul'tury, 2005.
5. Kubryakova E.S. Yazyk i znanie. M., 2004.
6. Luzina L.G. O kognitivno-diskursivnoj paradigme lingvisticheskogo znaniya//Paradigmy nauchnogo znaniya v sovremennoj lingvistike: Sb. nauchnyh trudov. M.: INION RAN, 2006.
7. Kubryakova E.S. Ob ustanovkah kognitivnoj nauki i aktual'nyh problemah kognitivnoj lingvistiki//Izv. AN. Seriya lit. i yaz. 2004. T. 63. № 3.
8. Syorl' Dzh.R. Kosvennye rechevye akty//Novoe v zarubezhnoj lingvistike. Vyp. XVII. M., 1986.
9. Kobozeva I.M. Ot redaktora//Novoe v zarubezhnoj lingvistike. Vyp. XVII. Teoriya rechevyh aktov. M., 1986.
10. Ostin Dzh. L. Slovo kak dejstvie//Novoe v zarubezhnoj lingvistike. Vyp. XVII. M., 1986.
11. Dem'yankov V.Z. “Teoriya rechevyh aktov” v kontekste sovremennoj zarubezhnoj lingvisticheskoj literatury//Novoe v zarubezhnoj lingvistike. Vyp. XVII. M., 1986.
12. Frank D. Sem' grekhov pragmatiki: tezisy o teorii rechevyh aktov, analize rechevogo obshcheniya, lingvistike i ritorike//Novoe v zarubezhnoj lingvistike. Vyp. XVII. M., 1986.
13. Arutyunova N.D. Diskurs//Lingvisticheskij enciklopedicheskij slovar'. M., 1990.
14. Stepanov Yu.S. Al'ternativnyj mir. Diskurs. Fakt i princip prichinnosti//Yazyk i nauka konca 20 veka. M., 1995.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate