Везде
A DIPLOMATIC TRANSCRIPT EDITION AS AN OBJECTIVE OF TEXTUAL SCHOLARSHIP: THREE PAGES FROM F.M. DOSTOYEVSKY'S "WORKING NOTEBOOKS"
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
A DIPLOMATIC TRANSCRIPT EDITION AS AN OBJECTIVE OF TEXTUAL SCHOLARSHIP: THREE PAGES FROM F.M. DOSTOYEVSKY'S "WORKING NOTEBOOKS"
Annotation
PII
S241377150000616-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
K. A. Barsht  Tat'yana Malafeevskaya
Edition
Volume 73 Issue 6
Pages
23-37
Abstract
One of the main sources of our knowledge of Dostoyevsky's creative habits in years 1860 s-1870 s are his 'working notebooks' (zapisnye tetradi). Existing editions of these notebooks seem to reproduce the text on the principle that only one important level of manuscript is worthy of being presented; namely, the verbal level itself. However, the fact is that Dostoyevsky's manuscripts (to take Crime and Punishment, for instance) are texts of many coexisting languages: verbal, graphical, verbal/graphical (special picture-writing, calligraphy, and other verbal/graphical means), which, taken together, create a complicated semantic structure. Here we speak for publication of a diplomatic transcript edition of Dostoyevsky's works, which would retain different levels of meaning - to a fuller extent, than it is possible in other types of scholarly editions.
Keywords
Dostoyevsky’s creative process, ‛diary / working notebooks’, verbal and ideographic languages in the manuscripts, diplomatic transcription method
Date of publication
01.11.2014
Number of purchasers
0
Views
1071
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Subscription benefits
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue and additional services
Subscription benefits
0 RUB / 0.0 SU
All issues and additional services for 2014
Subscription benefits
0 RUB /  SU
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Pushkin A.S. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij v 17 t. T. 18 (dopolnitel'nyj). Risunki. M., 1996. 
2. Efros A.M. Risunki poeta. M., 1933. 
3. Barsht K.A. Yazyki tvorcheskoj rukopisi F.M. Dostoevskogo//Yazyki rukopisej. Sb. statej. SPb., 2000. S.122-147. 
4. Glivenko I.I. Iz arhiva F.M. Dostoevskogo: “Prestuplenie i nakazanie”. Neizdannye materialy. M.; L., 1931. 
5. Sakulin P.N., Bel'chikov N.F. Iz arhiva F.M. Dostoevskogo. Idiot. Neizdannye materialy. M.; L., 1931. 
6. Rozenblyum L.M. Problemy publikacii zapisnyh knizhek pisatelya (iz opyta “Literaturnogo nasledstva”)//Sovremennaya tekstologiya: teoriya i praktika. M., 1997. S. 89-94.
7. Lebrav Zh.-L. Giperteksty -Pamyat' -Pis'mo//Geneticheskaya kritika vo Francii. Antologiya. M., 1999. S.255-275. 
8. Vinokur G.O. Kritika poeticheskogo teksta. M., 1927.
9. Levajan Zh. Pis'mo i genezis teksta//Geneticheskaya kritika vo Francii. 
10. Lotman Yu.M. Kul'tura i vzryv//Lotman Yu.M. Semiosfera. SPb., 2000. 
11. Barsht K.A. Risunki v rukopisi F.M. Dostoevskogo. SPb.,1996. 
12. Slobin Dzh.Gr. Psiholingvistika. M., 1976. 
13. Tarasova N.A. Uslovnye znaki Dostoevskogo (na materiale zapisnyh tetradej 1875-1876 i 18761877 gg.)//Dostoevskij i mirovaya kul'tura. Al'manah. № 20. SPb.; M., 2004. S. 375-394. 
14. Barsht K.A., Torop P.H. Rukopisi F.M. Dostoevskogo: risunok i kalligrafiya//Tekst i kul'tura. Semiotika. Trudy po znakovym sistemam, XVI. Tartu, 1983.
15. Perepiska P.A. Florenskogo s Andreem Belym//Kontekst. M., 1991. 
16. Tomashevskij B.V. Pisatel' i kniga. Ocherk tekstologii. M., 1959. 
17. Izmajlov N.V. Tekstologiya//Pushkin: Itogi i problemy izucheniya. M.; L., 1966. 
18. Grishunin A.L. Principy peredachi epistolyarnyh tekstov v pechati//Principy izdaniya epistolyarnyh tekstov. Voprosy tekstologii. Vyp. 3. M., 1964. 
19. Lihachev D.S. Tekstologiya. Kratkij ocherk. M., Nauka. 2006.
20. Rejser S.A. Osnovy tekstologii. L., 1978. 
21. Dolotova L.M. O tekste “Zapisok ohotnika” I.S. Turgeneva//Voprosy tekstologii. Sb. statej. Vyp. 1. M., 1957. 
22. Chudakova M.O. Rukopis' i kniga. M., 1986. 
23. Bel'men -Noel' Zh. Vossozdat' rukopis', opisat' chernoviki, sostavit' avantekst//Geneticheskaya kritika vo Francii. Antologiya. M., 1999. 
24. Biazi P.-M. de. K nauke o literature. Analiz rukopisej i genezis proizvedeniya//Geneticheskaya kritika vo Francii. Antologiya. M., 1999. S. 58-93.
25. Portretnye risunki F.M. Dostoevskogo k romanu “Prestuplenie i nakazanie”. CD-ROM. Mul'timedijnyj al'bom. SPb., “Al't-Soft”. 1999.
26. Lihachev D.S. Po povodu stat'i V. A. Chernyh o razvitii metodov peredachi teksta istoricheskih istochnikov//Istoricheskij arhiv. 1956. № 3. S.188-193.
27. Lihachev D.S., Alekseev A.A., Bobrov A.G. Tekstologiya na materiale russkoj literatury X-XVII vekov. SPb., 2001.
28. Dostoevskij F.M“Prestuplenie i nakazanie”. Rukopisnye redakcii//Dostoevskij F.M. Poln. sobr. soch.: v 30 t. T. 7. L., 1973.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate